adjusting for female superior performance

[F]or the first several years the SAT was offered, males scored higher than females on the Math section but females achieved higher scores on the Verbal section. ETS policy-makers determined that the Verbal test needed to be “balanced” more in favor of males, and added questions pertaining to politics, business and sports to the Verbal portion. Since that time, males have outscored females on both the Math and Verbal sections. Dwyer notes that no similar effort has been made to “balance” the Math section, and concludes that, “It could be done, but it has not been, and I believe that probably an unconscious form of sexism underlies this pattern. When females show the superior performance, ‘balancing’ is required; when males show the superior performance, no adjustments are necessary.”

~ from “Gender Bias in College Admissions Tests,” FairTest.org

writing violent

I recommend reading the whole article if you have time.

The serious writer, after all, bears witness. [...] So the serious male writer is allowed his vision and takes as his rightful subject a world as vast as Dostoyevsky’s Russia, or Melville’s oceans or Faulkner’s ”postage stamp of earth” in Mississippi. One does not inquire of them, ”Why is your writing so violent?”’

….

”You had an unhappy childhood, Miss Oates?” -asked with quizzical smiles, some measure of pity, sympathy. ”You were often frightened by life?”

….

If the lot of womankind has not yet widely diverged from that romantically envisioned by our Moral Majority and by the late Adolf Hitler (”Kirche, Kinder, Kuchen”), the lot of the woman writer has been just as severely circumscribed. War, rape, murder and the more colorful minor crimes evidently fall within the exclusive province of the male writer, just as, generally, they fall within the exclusive province of male action.

~ from Why Is Your Writing So Violent?, Joyce Carol Oates, New York Times, March 29 1981

she ain’t heavy, she’s a smart ass

Wish I knew who said this so I could thank them for the laugh (even if it did make me snort a little coffee):

With time, women gain weight because we accumulate so much information and wisdom in our heads that when there is no more room, it distributes out to the rest of our bodies. So we aren’t heavy, we are enormously cultured, educated and happy. Beginning today, when I look at my butt in the mirror I will think, “Good grief, look how smart I am!” Must be where “Smart Ass” came from!

- Anonymous

(thanks to Lipstick Feminists)

Sex work

You know that feeling you get when you know something is true but you can never articulate it well and then finally someone else does? I haz it.

Sex work in itself is not inherently anti-feminist. What is sexist about strip clubs, pornography and other commercial avenues of sex is the fact that our society has normalized the open expression of men’s sexual desire and not that of women.

getting to No

Such a spot-on and well-written piece by CaptainAwkward about “the art of No” that I must plug it, even though it’s brought back some unsavory memories. Who among us has not ended up saying “yes” or “maybe”, when we really wanted to say “hell no”, because we were afraid?

Women are socialized to make men feel good.  We’re socialized to “let you down easy.”  We’re not socialized to say a clear and direct “no.”  We’re socialized to speak in hints and boost egos and let people save face. People who don’t respect the social contract (rapists, predators, assholes, pickup artists) are good at taking advantage of this.

The classic shoulda-said-what-you-really-meant use case ends in physical violence. But we aren’t always afraid of being a victim. We often fear being a perpetrator, of “hurting their feelings” — which, if you dig deeper, means we believe that if we don’t want the same thing they want, then we must be “bad.”

As a twenty-something, I didn’t just say yes to a date, I said yes to a 9-month relationship that I already knew was the last thing I wanted. Why’d I do it? Because I felt guilty. We had both been happy being “friends with benefits” for at least a year, but for various reasons, he suddenly decided he wanted us to be monogamous. I felt like refusal would “hurt” him, and that I would be revealing myself as a heartless tease. How fucked up is that?

“No” is something we have to learn. “No” is something we have to earn.  In fact, I’d argue that the ability to just say “no” to something, without further comment, apology, explanation, guilt, or thinking about it is one of the great rites of passage in growing up, and when you start saying it and saying it regularly the world often pushes back.  And calls you names.

If I had a dime for every guy who’s called me a bitch because I didn’t smile at him on the street, my net wealth would rival J.K. Rowling’s.

Anyway, read the post. Actually, subscribe to the blog, it’s great.

more than a t-shirt

Because the Rib has become Quote Central of late, here’s one from the fierce Tina Fey:

Girls get a lot of mixed messages—they are told, “Girl Power!” and what does that mean? It means you wear a T-shirt that says “Girl Power!” but you call each other bitches. You make fun of a girl for being a virgin and you make fun of a girl for having sex. There’s no right place to be.

My friends, we must guard against the hypnotic pied piper Hypocrisy. Let’s wake up and kick its snarky ass.  If we want equality, respect, and all that jazz, we can’t wait for someone else to do it first.  It begins with us. (I still want a Girl Power t-shirt, though.)

(thanks to lipstick feminists for the quote)

doing the undoing

If you have a person enslaved, the first thing you must do is to convince yourself that the person is subhuman — and won’t mind the enslavement. The second thing you must do is convince your allies that the person is subhuman so that you have some support. But the third and the unkindest cut of all is to convince that person that he, she, is not quite a first-class citizen. When the complete job has been done, the initiator can go back years later and ask, “Why don’t you people like yourselves more?” You see? It’s been true for women, it’s been true for immigrants, it’s been true for Asians, it’s been true for Spanish-speaking people. So now we have to undo. We know this — and we have to undo these lessons which have been learned by all of us. And so it will be no small matter. But we can undo it. We can learn to see each other and see ourselves in each other and recognize that human beings are more alike than we are unalike.

Maya Angelou, accomplished poet, writer, activist and teacher